Had brunch at Salty's
I had a very nice birthday brunch at Salty’s on Alki.
Here’s a variety of different ways of linking to Salty’s on Google Maps:
I had a very nice birthday brunch at Salty’s on Alki.
Here’s a variety of different ways of linking to Salty’s on Google Maps:
I finally got a Nintendo Wii this weekend. Wii’s are in fairly short supply right now, so I couldn’t find one at a reasonable price on-line. If you live in the Seattle area, here’s my Wii-finding tip: Fred Meyer stores get deliveries on Wednesdays, Fridays, and Sundays, meaning that calling a Fred Meyer store at 7am on Sunday morning to check if they received a new shipment is a good way to find a Wii.
The total cost, with tax, an extra controller, and a component video cable was around $350.
I’ve got Wii Sports, Wii Play, and will be picking up Mario Galaxy this week. The primary users will probably be my kids, although I am very interested in trying out Mario Galaxy.
As a former Xbox 360 developer, I couldn’t help comparing the Wii to the Xbox 360. So far I give the Wii high marks for:
Some things I didn’t like about the Wii:
In conclusion, I’d have to rate the Wii as a much better “family” console than either the Xbox 360 or the PS3. And by family I mean “small children”. I’m lucky that I like the Wii’s UI and game style, because I have a feeling I’ll be hearing and seeing a lot of it over the next few years. As for my trusty 360, I suspect it will be mostly relegated to “Media Center Extender” status. (Although I am definitely looking forward to Alan Wake and I have high hopes for the next Banjo game. And I might get “The Orange Box” – Portal and Team Fortress 2 look like a lot of fun.)
Well, for what it’s worth, I’ve switched my MacBook from Ubuntu Linux back to OS X. Ubuntu Linux worked, but had lots of little problems:
So it’s back to OS X for me, for now.
I am disappointed by the new version of Apple OS X that was released this weekend. The UI has gone backwards in several areas. In particular, the translucent menus are hard to read, and the default “space theme” wall paper is ugly. So far it feels like a service pack with a bonus backup program.
I suspect that Apple is suffering from the same problem that Microsoft was with Vista, namely ”How do you improve on a very good existing product?” In addition, I suspect the company’s attention over the past year was focused on developing the iPhone, and perhaps not enough attention was paid to Leopard.
Still, I’m not sure what they could have done better – Desktop OSs are pretty much of a solved problem. But I suspect that as the hype wears off people will start to question whether Leopard is a significant improvement.
Ubuntu Studio is a nice idea in theory, but the execution is lacking. The goal is to create a version of Ubuntu optimized for media creation by:
The problem is that there are a lot of rough edges:
The wireless hardware support issues make this a non-starter release for me, but I enjoyed giving it a whirl.
I recently read a positive review of Linux by a man who said he was a doctor, not a programmer, and that he found Linux very easy to set up and use.
That’s great, but you have to take recommendations like that with a grain of salt. I’m not a doctor, but three of my siblings-in-law are doctors, and a fourth is a nurse, and one thing I’ve noticed is that medical professionals are extremely good at following technical directions. I think it’s a skill that comes from how medicine is practiced – you diagnose the patient, then apply a recommended treatment. Just like debugging a computer problem!
Maintaining Linux, like maintaining a patient’s health, requires researching a scattered body of knowledge and deciding how to apply a mass of conflicting advice. Both tasks reward careful study, and exact replication of the recommended treatment. For doctors this way of working is second nature, but I don’t think laymen will find it so easy.
I’ve been tearing down and reinstalling Ubuntu 7.10 all weekend, trying to get wireless video playback to work well. Here’s my list of tweaks, all of which are unrelated to wireless video playback:
I was up early this morning to get the Ubuntu 7.10 final release. I used the Ubuntu torrent (1700 downloaders) to download the file, and had the ISO image within an hour. Pretty neat!
In theory I didn’t actually need to install Ubuntu 7.10 final. In theory it would be just as good to start with a late release candidate and apply patches. But I wanted a clean start.
I did run into an odd glitch during the install: the Macbook LCD display was corrupted when I first booted up off the LiveCD. I did a cold reboot and all was well. Go figure.
About six months ago I left Microsoft for Google. One of the big differences between the two companies is the tool chains that they use. Microsoft mostly uses its own tools, many of which they also offer to sale to third parties, while Google uses mostly open-source tools. I thought people might be interested in seeing the differences.
Note that my experience may not be representative of most Microsoft or Google employees, because I was not working in the main-line part of Microsoft (I was in the Xbox team), and I am not currently working in the main-line part of Google. So in both cases I am not familiar with the specialized tools that each company has developed for doing its mainline work.
Here’s a comparison of the tools I used at each company:
Visual Studio vs. Eclipse 3.3
I give Visual Studio the edge on debugging UI and IntelliSense. But Eclipse has some nice features, such as showing errors in the scroll bar
C++, C# vs. C/C++, Java
Microsoft C++ is better than Gnu C++, and C# is better than Java. But it’s a 10% difference, not a 100% difference.
NMAKE vs. GNU make
GNU make’s better – at least it seems to take less code to implement fancy build rules.
Internal tool (similar to perforce) vs perforce
It’s a wash - they’re both very similar to each other.
Internal tool “Project Studio” vs. Internal tool “Buganizer”
Google’s system has more integration into email. For example, if a bug is opened against you, you get an email, and if you reply to the email your reply is automatically appended to the bug report. Also, Google’s system is web- based, which makes it more convenient to use.
Outlook 2007 vs. gmail
Overall I like gmail, but Outlook does have one feature I really miss: I set up a special folder for all the “checkin mails”, that was sorted by name. This made it very easy to scan through people’s checkins. gmail only allows mail to be sorted by time, which is less convenient for scanning checkin mails. I’m pretty sure that Google gives employees more email storage space than Microsoft does, but I don’t remember the exact numbers at Microsoft. I do know that after 6 months at Google I’m at 1% of my quota, whereas at Microsoft, after 10 years, I was always bumping up against my quota limit.
Internet Explorer vs. Firefox
Firefox has some great plug-ins, such as Ad Blocker Plus. but IE had the edge on printing and stability.
Office 2007 vs. Google Docs
Office 2007 has a superior UI and far more features. Google Docs is “good enough” for programming docs, and I like the web integration very much.
Vista Ultimate vs. Mac OS / Ubuntu Linux
I like Ubuntu a lot more than I thought I would. I like Mac OS a lot less than I thought I would. And Vista is fine, too.
Dual-Proc Xeon x 2, no laptop vs. Quad-Proc Xeon, Dual Proc Xeon, Macbook Pro laptop
Google is more generous with hardware, especially in giving most employees their own laptops. And of course Microsoft only gives Mac hardware to people who write Mac apps.
Dual 1280x1024 21” CRTs vs. Single 30 inch 2560 x 1600 LCD or two 24-inch 1920 x 1200 LCDs
I love the large LCD screen. Actually I disliked the Microsoft CRTs so much that I went out and bought a 20 inch 1600x1200 LCD with my own money. For $800 (that was a few years ago, when they first came out.)
Large private office with a window vs. Small desk in shared 8-person interior office. No window.
Having a private office is nice, but there are advantages to sharing an office with people who work on the same project. Google issues noise-canceling headphones to help reduce distractions. I’d have to say that Microsoft has the edge here, but Google is not nearly as bad as I thought it would be.
Overall I’d say the two tool chains are roughly equivalent. I found it pretty easy to transition. I was productive at Google after just a few days of training. By far the biggest qualitative difference is due to the giant HP 2560 x 1600 LCD monitor I’m using now. It’s wonderful to have so much contiguous desk space. To be fair to Microsoft, I believe that new employees at Microsoft are now being issued 20” 1600 x 1200 LCDs, and many programmers manage to scrounge a second LCD. But Google’s much more generous at outfitting programmers with hardware than Microsoft.
A friend recently asked me for advice on buying a laptop for a college student. Here’s the advice I gave them: These days laptops from different companies are all pretty similar. They use roughly the same parts, and are built in exactly the same Chinese factories. So I would try to figure out roughly what configuration you wanted, and then shop for the best deal, pretty much ignoring the manufacturer.
The first decision, and the only one where the manufacturer matters, is whether you want a Macintosh or a non-Macintosh. The benefits of a Mac are:
The disadvantages of a Macintosh are:
I currently own a MacBook and I also use a MacBook Pro laptop at work. I bought the MacBook because I thought it was pretty, and I wanted to experiment with using Apple software. I like it – it is a good compromise on size, performance, cost, and so on. I especially like the service I get from the Apple Store. I live about 2 miles away from the Bellevue Apple Store. I have had two problems with my Macbook since I bought it:
My kids pulled off several of the keys, and even lost three. The Apple Store gave me replacement keys for free, and even put them on the keyboard for me, also for free.
The laptop battery stopped working. In this case the Apple Store gave me a new battery ($100 value) free, no questions asked.
I also use a Macbook Pro loaned to me by my work. They give people a choice between a Macbook Pro and a Leonovo Thinkpad T60. I’d say the split is about 50/50 on which notebook people choose. The Leonovo Thinkpad line, formerly made by IBM is one of the best “no nonsense business computer” laptop lines. They have especially good keyboards. The Macbook Pro is much larger than the Macbook. It is also much heavier. I find both notebooks are good, and I don’t think the Macbook Pro, at around $2500, is 2.5 times better than the Macbook, at around $1000. If it were my own money, I would buy the Macbook rather than the Macbook Pro. As for non-Macintosh laptops, I would look for a laptop with these features:
A good keyboard
Built in wireless networking
1 GB of RAM
A good screen (bright and easy to read.)
40 GB hard disk
CD-ROM/DVD-ROM drive
Weight around 4 to 5 pounds.
Doesn’t get too hot in use, has a quiet fan.
Price around $800 to $1200
If given a choice between several models with different speeds of CPU, I would choose the cheapest/slowest, because all of the CPUs are really fast these days. And I would be happy to buy a slightly older laptop model on sale. Laptops typically are only sold for 6 months, they are then replaced by a slightly better model. When a model is replaced, it often goes on sale at a good price. I would consider laptops by pretty much any brand. And I think I would try to see the laptops in person before buying, as that’s the best way to judge whether the screen looks good, or the keyboard is comfortable to type on. One frustrating thing about laptops is that the build quality varies greatly from model to model, even within the same company. So just because one model is reliable, doesn’t mean another similar model from the same company will be reliable. A good web site for laptop review information is www.notebookreview.com.